vibecheck
comparisons

How does vibecheck compare
to other security scanners?

There are a lot of security tools. This page compares vibecheck against the ones indie developers most often consider. Every claim below reflects the tools' current pricing and feature pages as of July 2026.

QUICK ANSWER

vibecheck is the only scanner built specifically for the threat model of vibe-coded apps — Supabase RLS gaps, unauthenticated Next.js routes, and secrets in AI-generated code — and the only one that explains every finding in plain English without requiring security expertise. For dependency CVEs, Snyk is still the better choice and they work well together.

head-to-head comparisons

vibecheck vs GitHub Code Scanning

vibecheck wins here

GitHub Code Scanning (CodeQL) is built into every repo and free for public projects, but it requires a YAML workflow, targets enterprise teams, and has no vibe-specific checks or plain-English triage.

vibecheck vs Snyk

use both

Snyk is the market leader for dependency scanning (SCA) with excellent npm/yarn integration and a free tier. For dependency CVEs it's hard to beat. vibecheck is the stronger choice for source-code patterns — Supabase RLS gaps, unauthenticated routes, and secrets are outside Snyk's core focus.

Choose Snyk use both — Snyk for dependencies, vibecheck for source patterns.

vibecheck vs Semgrep

competitor wins here

vibecheck runs Semgrep under the hood. Semgrep's cloud product adds team dashboards and a rule editor — genuinely useful for engineering teams. For a solo dev who just wants to know what's broken and why, vibecheck pre-selects the right rule packs and puts Claude on top to explain findings without requiring any Semgrep knowledge.

Choose Semgrep for teams that want to write custom rules.

vibecheck vs Aikido Security

vibecheck wins here

Aikido covers more surface area — SAST, SCA, DAST, IaC, containers, and cloud posture — starting at €300/month (10 users). It's a serious AppSec platform for teams that need all of that. vibecheck covers the subset that actually matters for a vibe-coded app and costs nothing to start.

vibecheck vs Sonarcloud

competitor wins here

Sonarcloud is the standard for code quality + security in CI pipelines, free for open-source. It requires a CI integration step, outputs results in a dashboard that assumes security familiarity, and has no Supabase RLS or vibe-coding specific checks. vibecheck is faster to get started and explains results for developers who aren't security specialists.

Choose Sonarcloud for open-source projects that already have a CI pipeline.

feature matrix

vibecheckGitHub CSSnykSemgrepSonarcloud
Zero-config setup~
Secrets / API key detection~~
OWASP SAST patterns~
Supabase RLS checks
Unauth route detection
Dependency CVE scanning~~
AI triage (plain English)
Free tier
Solo-dev pricing£12/mo$25/mo$25/mo$15/mo

~ = partial or requires configuration. Prices checked July 2026 — verify at each vendor's pricing page.

best security scanner for each tool

Best scanner for Lovable apps →vibecheck

Lovable apps are full-stack Next.js + Supabase by default. The most common security gaps are disabled RLS and unauthenticated API routes — exactly what vibecheck's custom checks target.

Best scanner for Cursor apps →vibecheck

Cursor generates a lot of code fast. vibecheck catches the patterns Cursor skips — missing auth on routes, NEXT_PUBLIC_ secret exposure, and weak session handling.

Best scanner for Bolt apps →vibecheck

Bolt.new apps ship with Supabase and a full API layer. vibecheck's RLS scanner and unauthenticated-route check are the most important first pass before going to production.

Best scanner for v0 by Vercel apps →vibecheck

v0 generates UI components rather than full-stack apps, so the security surface is narrower. Run vibecheck on the repo it ends up in, plus enable GitHub Code Scanning on the Vercel-connected repo for ongoing CI coverage.

Best scanner for Replit apps →vibecheck

Replit apps often have secrets in source and no auth on endpoints — both things vibecheck catches with Gitleaks and the custom unauthenticated-routes check.

alternatives guides

Snyk alternatives for indie developers

The strongest Snyk alternatives for solo devs in 2026: vibecheck (source SAST + secrets + vibe-specific checks, free for 2 repos), GitHub Code Scanning (free for public repos, CI setup required), Semgrep OSS (run locally, no dashboard).

GitHub Code Scanning alternatives

GitHub Code Scanning requires a CodeQL workflow and targets teams. Alternatives that need no CI setup: vibecheck (one GitHub OAuth, instant results, Claude triage), Semgrep Cloud (powerful rule editor, free tier), Aikido (comprehensive but team-priced).

Aikido Security alternatives for small teams

Aikido's pricing (€300+/mo, 10-user minimum) is overkill for small teams. Practical alternatives: vibecheck (Solo at £12/mo or Indie Stack at £27/mo), Snyk (free tier generous for SCA), Sonarcloud (free for open source).

Why vibecheck exists

Every scanner on this page was designed before vibe coding was a mainstream development pattern. They're good at what they do — but they assume the developer wrote the code themselves and understands what they're looking at.

Vibe-coded apps have a predictable and different set of vulnerabilities: AI models optimise for functional code, not secure defaults. They forget to enable RLS. They generate API routes without auth checks. They expose secrets in client-side variables. Generic scanners find some of this, but they output raw rule IDs that require security expertise to act on.

vibecheck runs the tools that catch these patterns (Gitleaks, Semgrep, njsscan) plus checks written specifically for the vibe-coding threat model, then passes every finding through Claude to produce a plain-English explanation and a concrete fix — not a reference to OWASP A03.

stop comparing. start scanning.

Free for 2 repos. No credit card.

Connect a GitHub repo and see your findings in under 2 minutes.

Scan your first repo free →